Friday, 30 November, 2018

09:00 | Special Event

Mentoring Program for Women Researchers

Third part of our free mentoring program supporting women in their PhD studies, helping them to define career goals and the steps needed to achieve them.

This meeting with special guests and alumni will focus on working in international organizations and private sector. Topics to be discussed: Networking, Applying to international organizations, Work-life balance.

Guests: Anita Taci (Deputy Director, Strategy Coordination & Results Management at EBRD; CERGE-EI Alumna), Dragana Stanisic (Senior Consultant at GfK; CERGE-EI alumna), Susan Walton (Partner, Frost Consulting; CERGE-EI Foundation Board Member), Alice Machova (Partner, Financial Accounting Advisory Services; Climate Change and Sustainability Services, EY Czech republic).

Funded by the US Embassy in Prague.

14:00 | Micro Theory Research Seminar

Sandro Shelegia, Ph.D. (UPF) “All-Pay Contests with Costly Participation and Default Allocations”

Sandro Shelegia, Ph.D.

Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

________________________________________

Authors: Sandro Shelegia and Chris Wilson


Abstract: Players often face direct costs of participating in contests due to set-up costs or minimum outlays. In such cases, the outcome can depend upon the `default allocation' - how the prize is awarded if no player actively competes. The existing literature has neglected this issue by implicitly assuming that the prize is only awarded under active participation. However, in practice, there are many important situations where this does not apply - policymakers still allocate funding even when there are no lobbying activities, and employees still gain new responsibilities even when no-one competed for them. To help better address these issues, our paper makes three main contributions. First, it provides a general framework that can explicitly characterize all potential equilibria in all-pay contests (e.g. Siegel 2009) while allowing for any default allocation, any form of participation cost, and any arbitrary level of asymmetry. Second, as a by-product, the paper formally connects all-pay contests to the family of `clearinghouse' sales models (e.g. Baye et al 2004) and shows, for the first time, how they can be solved for any arbitrary asymmetry. Third, to further demonstrate our framework's power, the paper shows how default allocations can be used as a new tool in optimal contest design.
________________________________________